Dorsey

Dorsey v. Newcomer

Caution
121 Cal. 213·1898 Cal. LEXIS 877·53 P. 557
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 15, 1898Sac. No. 395California834 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Temple, J.

This action was brought to obtain an accounting in a mining partnership, a dissolution of the copartnership, the payment of the partnership debts and distribution of any surplus funds remaining.

In the complaint it is alleged that on the tenth day of June, 1895, Caleb Dorsey and J. T. Newcomer were the owners of ten designated mining claims, with quartz mill, tools, etc. Caleb Dorsey owned an undivided three-fourths’ interest and Newcomer the remaining one-fourth. A conveyance from Caleb Dorsey to plaintiffs Thomas B. Dorsey, Edward W. Dorsey, and E. Snyder Dorsey of a part of his interest February 5, 1896, is averred, and also that Caleb Dorsey died April 21, 1896, and plaintiff E. L. Ewing is administratrix of his estate. It is then charged that debts were incurred in working, operating, and developing said mines and mining property.

The findings of the court are generally in accordance with the complaint, but it is found as follows:

Notwithstanding this absolute finding that the alleged partners were not at any time engaged in working any of the mining claims except the Snell claim, and that all the work done by them as copartners was done upon said claim, in finding 6 the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.