Dickey

Dickey v. Gibson

Good Law
121 Cal. 276·1898 Cal. LEXIS 892·53 P. 704
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 25, 1898Sac. No. 419California881 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

Ejectment for certain lands in the county of Stanislaus. Samuel Gibson was the owner of the lands in question in his lifetime, and executed a mortgage thereon to the plaintiff December 2, 1889, to secure the payment of his promissory note for five thousand seven hundred dollars, with interest. Gibson died May 28, 1894, and his widow, Crecencia Gibson, was appointed executrix of his last "will and testament. October 17, 1894, the plaintiff commenced an action in the superior court for the foreclosure of his mortgage against the said executrix and certain other defendants claiming interests in the mortgaged property. The executrix appeared and answered the complaint, and upon the trial of the cause judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the foreclosure and sale of the lands in satisfaction of his claim. This judgment was afterward affirmed by this court. (Dickey v. Gibson, 113 Cal. 26 ; 54 Am. St. Rep. 321 .) At the sale under the judgment the plaintiff became the purchaser, and a deed for the land was executed to him by the sheriff December 8, 1895. After the execution of this deed, and after the judgment had been affirmed in this court, the surviving widow, Crecencia…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.