Wilson

Wilson v. California Bank

Good Law
121 Cal. 630·54 P. 119
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 9, 1898L. A. No. 449California834 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McFarland, J.

This is an action to quiet title to a certain lot of land. Judgment went in the court below for plaintiff, and defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

The plaintiff claims title to the lot through a sale made pursuant to a judgment enforcing a lien for an assessment for street improvements upon the lot. On November 22, 1887, one Burlingame was the owner of the lot in question, and on that day executed a deed conveying the lot to the present defendant, the California Bank, which deed was on said day duly recorded. Afterward, and while the record title thus stood in the defendant, there was an assessment duly made upon the lot for street improvements, and one Brearly brought suit to foreclose the same, making the defendant, the California Bank, a party defendant thereto. Such proceedings were had that a judgment enforcing the lien was entered, and the lot was sold by the sheriff to said Brearly to satisfy the assessment; a certificate of sale was issued to him, which on November 3, 1890, was duly recorded; and thereafter, on February 14, 1891, he assigned the certificate to one M. C. Marsh. This assignment Marsh did not cause to be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.