Bennett

Bennett v. Wilson

Good Law
122 Cal. 509·1898 Cal. LEXIS 622·55 P. 390
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 30, 1898Sac. No. 440California2,622 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chipman, J.

Action to determine the invalidity of a certain judgment lien and that the holder thereof is not a redemp *511 tioner, and that plaintiff, under his redemption, is entitled to sheriff’s deed. A demurrer, interposed to the amended complaint upon several grounds, was sustained, and defendants had judgment dismissing the action, from which plaintiff appeals.

The facts alleged which are necessary to illustrate the main question discussed by counsel may he briefly stated. Defendant company is a foreign corporation and owned and operated mining property in Plumas county; defendant Bransford is sheriff of said county; defendant Wilson is a stockholder in and the managing agent and in actual control and management of the property of defendant corporation; in 1885, one Swearingen obtained a judgment lien against the property of defendant corporation which was sold on execution, and one Cole became the purchaser at sheriff’s sale July 18, 1896; the defendant corporation did not redeem; plaintiff obtained a judgment lien before the time of redemption expired, and with it redeemed from the purchaser and sixty days thereafter demanded a deed from the sheriff, which was refused for the alleged…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.