George

George v. Pierce

Caution
123 Cal. 172·1898 Cal. LEXIS 1008·55 P. 775
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 29, 1898S. F. No. 883California2,124 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Garoutte, J.

Plaintiff, claiming to be pledgeholder brings this action for conversion of the pledged property. Some of the facts presented by the record are as follows: De Long-owned a large tract of land in Marin county, upon which land he kept a great number of dairy cows. He borrowed twenty-five thousand dollars from Cowell and gave these dairy cows into the possession of George, the plaintiff herein, as pledge-holder, to secure the lien. During the life of the pledge De Long, under the provisions of the Civil Code, made an assignment for the benefit of creditors, and Pierce, the defendant, became the assignee under such assignment. Thereafter, deeming the proceedings pertaining to the pledge void, he took possession of the cows. The pledgeholder thereupon brought the present action in conversion for damages. One herd of these cows is involved in the present ease. Other cases are pending, resting largely upon similar facts, as to the remaining herds.

In Francisco v.Aguirre, 94 Cal. 180 , it was held that an assignee such as this defendant Pierce stood in the shoes of his assignor. Hence, if De Long had no right to take the possession of these cows from the pledgeholder, then Pierce had no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.