Straube

Straube v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance

Good Law
123 Cal. 677·1899 Cal. LEXIS 1137·56 P. 546
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 7, 1899S. F. No. 1065California1,536 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Garoutte, J.

Plaintiff, Laura M. Straube, insured the life of her husband for her benefit in the sum of ten thousand dollars, under a contract of insurance known as the ordinary life dividend insurance policy. The premiums upon this policy were paid for several years, when a failure to pay the annual premium occurred. Some time thereafter the plaintiff surrend *678 ered the policy to the company for a cash consideration. Thereafter, and within eighteen months of the default in the payment of said premium, Straube, the insured, died. This action was thereupon brought against the company by plaintiff, the wife, upon a complaint claiming and alleging damages by reason of fraud and deceit practiced by the company in the procurement of the policy of insurance from her. A demurrer was sustained to the complaint and judgment for defendant rendered, no answer being filed.

The single question presented is, Does the complaint state a cause of action? As to the special grounds of demurrer, we pass them as involving questions of no great importance to the disposition of the appeal. It appears to be conceded that the question before the court is, Was this policy of insurance of substantial value to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.