United States v. Michael Anthony Hidalgo

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 5370·932 F.2d 805·1991 WL 71439·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8995·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3388
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 8, 199189-50457California1,067 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tanner, J.

Michael Anthony Hidalgo appeals his sentence under the sentencing guidelines, after a guilty plea, for unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). He argues that the district court erred by including a 1977 robbery conviction and then determining that he was a career offender pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 et seq. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We reverse and remand to the district court for resentencing.

I

On May 2, 1989, an indictment was filed which charged Hidalgo with four counts of unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). Hidalgo pled guilty on June 19, 1989 to Count One of the indictment which charged him with committing a March 17, 1989 robbery of American Savings and Loan Association in La Puente, California.

A presentence report was ordered and prepared. In that report, the probation officer determined that Hidalgo was included within the career offender guidelines, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 et seq., because the instant offense (unarmed bank robbery) is a crime of violence and Hidalgo has two prior convictions for crimes of violence within the meaning of U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2. One of the prior convictions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.