Tuffree

Tuffree v. Stearns Ranchos Co.

Good Law
124 Cal. 306·1899 Cal. LEXIS 991·57 P. 69
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 14, 1899L. A. No. 387California1,836 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Garoutte, J.

Moses Hopkins, claiming to own an interest in a tract of land, was joined with others as a party defendant in an action to quiet title. Bicknell & White appeared as attorneys for all the defendants. During the litigation, and five years prior to j udgment, Hopkins transferred his interest in the property to the Stearns Ranchos Company. After judgment, and prior to an appeal therefrom by plaintiffs, Hopkins died. Thereafter Bicknell & White accepted notice of appeal in behalf of all the defendants, and the ease was heard and decided in this court upon its merits. Upon the return of the remittitur to the lower court a judgment was entered in accordance with the directions therein contained. Whereupon the Stearns Ranchos Company, by E. W. McGraw, its attorney, having had itself substituted as a party defendant, moved to amend the judgment as to the interest represented under the name of Moses Hopkins, upon the ground that this court failed to obtain jurisdiction over the Hopkins interest in the realty by reason of the fact of his death at the time the notice of appeal was served upon Bicknell & White. Ho substitution of any party defendant in lieu of Hopkins was ever made until the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.