Wittfield

Wittfield v. Forster

Good Law
124 Cal. 418·1899 Cal. LEXIS 1010·57 P. 219
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 16, 1899L. A. No. 546California1,289 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McFarland, J.

This action is brought by the executor and heirs-at-law of Gustav Wittfield against the defendants, George Forster and San Diego Lodge No. 35, Free and Accepted Masons, an unincorporated association. There are two counts in the complaint; the first count is in the ordinary form of an action to quiet title to certain lands, and the second count avers the execution by the deceased, Gustav Wittfield, of an instrument in writing, executed by him a few days before his death, *419 purporting to convey all Ms properly, both real and personal, to the said George Forster in trust for the said San Diego Lodge, and the prayer is that said deed be decreed to be void, and to have created no trust, and that the plaintiffs are entitled to the possession of the land embraced by said instrument, and that defendants be decreed to account for the personal property referred to in said instrument. The court rendered judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiffs appeal from the judgment.

The case turns upon the question whether or not the instrument above referred to creates a valid trust. The following is a copy of said instrument:

This instrument is manifestly not a conve)rance to Forster for his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.