Riego

Riego v. Foster

Good Law
125 Cal. 178·1899 Cal. LEXIS 822·57 P. 896
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 21, 1899S. F. No. 1148California922 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McFarland, J.

The plaintiff, as assignee in involuntary insolvency of Briare & Kenny, insolvent debtors, brought this action to recover the value of certain property alleged to have been assigned by said insolvents to the defendants within one month prior to the filing of the petition in insolvency, and in violation of section 59 of the Insolvent Act of 1895. Judgment went for plaintiff, and defendants appeal from the judgment.

The points made for reversal arise upon the pleadings and findings, and a short hill of exceptions showing a certain ruling of the court striking out part of the answer; no other ruling of *181 the court not shown by the judgment roll is before us, nor is any evidence brought up.

The petition of creditors to have the persons named declared insolvent, the decree adjudging them insolvent, and all the proceedings in insolvency down to and including the assignment by the cleric to the respondent, were regular on their face. But the appellants, in their answer in this present case, set up as a defense, among other things, that the signers of the petition were not actually creditors of the insolvents in the amount required by the act, and that therefore the proceedings were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.