Rauer

Montgomery v. Rauer

Good Law
125 Cal. 227·1899 Cal. LEXIS 834·57 P. 894
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 24, 1899S. F. No. 1197California1,326 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hehshaw, J.

Plaintiffs, who are minors, sued defendant by an action in form for moneys had and received. Defendant answered, alleging that “the above-named minors have received all of the moneys deposited by their said guardian, Agnes S. Montgomery, with this defendant.” He followed this averment by a denial that the sum of four thousand dollars demanded in the complaint, or any other sum of money, was due, owing, and unpaid from him to the plaintiffs. The action was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict against him in the sum of fifteen hundred dollars. From the judgment and from the order denying him a new trial, he appeals.

The following are the salient facts: Mrs. Montgomery was a widow and the mother of the plaintiffs. Defendant Bauer possessed her confidence, and managed many of her business and legal affairs. She was guardian of the estates of her children. She put into Bauer’s hands two thousand dollars of her own money and five thousand dollars of the money of the children. Bauer received these funds with full knowledge of their origin, character, and ownership. He knew that the five thousand dollars were the trust funds of the minors, and so received it. Other moneys of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.