Walker

Walker v. Walker

Good Law
125 Cal. 242·1899 Cal. LEXIS 837·57 P. 991
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 24, 1899S. F. No. 1327California2,571 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Temple, J.

The appellant, J. M. Walker, is the administrator of John Walker, deceased, and the appeal is from the decree settling his final account as administrator, he having resigned his trust.

Before the death of John Walker appellant was indebted to him in the sum of eight thousand dollars, with interest, and alleges that he was at the time of his appointment, and ever since has been, entirely insolvent. Upon the settlement of his final account he offered evidence to prove his insolvency, and that the debt due from him to the estate remained uncollected without his fault. An objection was made to the offered evidence on the ground of incompetency, irrelevancy, and immateriality, and because the matter has been adjudicated and settled in the decree settling the annual account. For the purposes of this appeal, therefore, the evidence rejected must be deemed sufficient to establish the fact that the debt was uncollectible, and the controversy is as to its materiality. It may be remarked here, however, that insolvency might not be a reason for not *244 charging the administrator, even if the view contended for by the appellant be correct. One may be insolvent and yet be able to pay a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.