Burk

Burk v. Arcata & Mad River Railroad

Good Law
125 Cal. 364·1899 Cal. LEXIS 864·57 P. 1065
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 14, 1899S. F. No. 1121California1,836 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Temple, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment and from an order refusing a new trial. The suit was brought by a sister and two brothers of George W. Burk to recover damages for his death, which was caused by the negligence of the defendant. The plaintiffs are all adults, and the deceased at the time of his death was thirty-four years old. It was admitted that he was in good health, a competent and reliable locomotive engineer, in the receipt of monthly wages in the sum of seventy-five dollars, and.was well inured to his work. He had never been married and was boarding with one of his brothers immediately before the accident, and was on friendly terms with plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs recovered judgment for fifteen hundred dollars. The defendant contends that there was no evidence which tended to show any damage whatever, and therefore plaintiffs were entitled to nominal damages only. An instruction to that effect was asked and refused. This presents the only question on the motion for a new trial or on the appeal.

The instructions actually given to the jury by the court on the subject of damages are not complained of. Instruction 27 contains a full and correct statement of the general rule. It is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.