Parrott

London & San Francisco Bank, Ltd. v. Parrott

Good Law
125 Cal. 472·1899 Cal. LEXIS 885·58 P. 164
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 28, 1899S. F. No. 1167California4,688 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

The defendants in the above-entitled cause (with others) executed and delivered to the plaintiff, September 30, 1891, the following instrument:

*480 October 5, 1891, the Capitol Packing Company opened an account with the plaintiff, and thereafter, until August 30, 1894, made deposits of moneys for its said account, drew checks against the same, and received advances by way of loans from said bank, which said advances were, by the said packing company’s agreement with said bank, to draw interest, - payable monthly, at the rate of seven per cent per annum. In July, 1893, the San Francisco Clearing House, of which the plaintiff was a member, promulgated a rule for the government -of its members, that they should not allow overdrafts on the part of their customers; and for the purpose of complying with this rule the Capitol Packing Company, at the request of the plaintiff, delivered to it on the sixth day of September, its promissory note for the sum of $73,000, bearing date August 31, 1893, and payable one day after date. At that time the books of the bank showed an indebtedness on the part of the packing company of $72,899-.61. This note was not accepted by the bank as payment, but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.