Jack

Jack v. Sinsheimer

Good Law
125 Cal. 563·1899 Cal. LEXIS 902·58 P. 130
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 10, 1899L. A. No. 467California1,932 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Cooper, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiff to quiet his title to a certain tract of land described in the complaint. The defendant answered, and in his answer set forth a certain mortgage made by one Cheda, which mortgage was claimed to be a valid lien upon the premises in favor of defendant. The plaintiff demurred to the answer upon the ground that the facts therein stated did not constitute any defense to the action; the demurrer was sustained, and, defendant declining to amend, judgment was rendered against him. This appeal is by defendant from the judgment and for the purpose of reviewing the order sustaining the demurrer. It appears from the answer that on June 19, 1891, one Andrews, as lessor, leased to one Cheda, as lessee, certain premises in San Luis Obispo county for the period of five years from and after October 1, 1891, at an annual rental of two thousand dollars, one-third of the annual rent payable every four months in advance. This lease contained the following covenant:

At the time of making the said lease the defendant signed an indorsement thereon in the following language:

On January 25, 1894, the said Cheda was the owner in fee of the property described in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.