Vernon School Disrict v. Board of Education of Los Angeles

Good Law
125 Cal. 593·1899 Cal. LEXIS 908·58 P. 175
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 17, 1899L. A. No. 510California810 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

Action to quiet title. Defendant had judgment, and plaintiff appeals therefrom and from an order denying a new trial.

In 1876 the plaintiff purchased the property in, question for school purposes, and the same was conveyed to the trustees of said district for school purposes only. In 1896 certain territory was added to the city of Los Angeles, which added territory embraced a portion of said Vernon school district, including said schoolsite and improvements. It is conceded that the proceedings for the annexation of said additional territory to the city of Los Angeles were regular, and the validity of said annexation is not questioned, except by an attack upon the constitutionality of the act of 1889, under which the annexation proceedings were taken. The portion of Vernon school district not included in the annexed territory still maintains its organization and name as such district, and prosecutes this suit to quiet its title to the property formerly conveyed to it for school purposes, but which is now within the limits of the city of Los Angeles; and the question is, whether said lot is now owned and should be controlled by said Vernon school district, or by the board of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.