Day

People v. Day

Good Law
135 Cal. 360
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 1902Crim. No. 835California124 words

Lead Opinion

The defendant was charged by the information with having committed the infamous crime against nature, was tried by a jury and found guilty, and was sentenced to imprisonment at San Quentin for the term of ten years, and he now appeals from said judgment and an order denying a new trial.

The transcript consists of the judgment-roll and notice of appeal, without any statement or bill of exceptions. Upon the trial he had the aid of competent counsel, but no brief has *361 been filed in his behalf. The information was not objected to, and appears to be sufficient, nor do we discover any errors in the instructions given to the jury or in the proceedings.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.-