Cutten
Cutten v. McCarthy
160 Cal. 809
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 1911S. F. No. 5511; S. F. No. 5512; S. F. No. 5513California72 words
Lead Opinion
These cases being exactly similar in all particulars to Barendt v. McCarthy, S. F. No. 5507, ante, p.' 680, in which the opinion was filed this day, the judgment of the lower court in each of them is, upon authority of that case, affirmed.
Dissenting Opinion
Sloss, J.
I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Barendt v. McCarthy, this day filed.
Beatty, O. J., and Angellotti, J., concurred.
Rehearing in each denied.