Rea
County of Kings v. Rea
164 Cal. 508
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 1913S. F. No. 6431California110 words
Lead Opinion
Henshaw, J.
acting chief justice, delivered the opinion of the court. If those are your two propositions, I speak for the Court in saying that where there is no specific requirement of the law declaring that money of a particular form or kind shall be designated, it is a good bond and it is in full compliance with the law, when it calls for “lawful money of the United States.”
And, second, it is clearly a power vested with the supervisors, after election, to determine whether the interest shall be paid semi-annually or annually. If those are your two propositions, they are resolved in favor of petitioner, and mandate will issue accordingly.