Waite

Waite v. Waite

Good Law
180 Cal. 238
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 17, 1919L. A. No. 5992California80 words

Lead Opinion

[l] The respondent herein confesses error, and asks that the interlocutory judgment appealed from be reversed for the reason set forth in appellant’s opening brief.

The point made for reversal in the appellant’s opening brief appears to be well based and requires a reversal. The plaintiff should be allowed to amend her complaint in the lower court.

The judgment appealed from is reversed.

Shaw, J., Olney, J., Wilbur, J., Lawlor, J., Melvin, J., Lennon, J., and Angellotti, C. J., concurred.