James

James v. Rowe

Good Law
188 Cal. 663
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 2, 1922Sac. No. 3294California59 words

Lead Opinion

At the close of the argument the court rendered its opinion as follows:

The court expresses no opinion as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding that the will was not properly executed.

The judgment is affirmed.

Shaw, C. J., Lawlor, J., Wilbur, J., Lennon, J., Shurtleff, J., Sloane, J., and Richards, J., pro tem., concurred.