Fitch
North Confidence Mining & Development Co. v. Fitch
193 Cal. 336
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 1924Sac. No. 3561California125 words
Lead Opinion
The respondents moved to dismiss the appeal from the judgment taken by the appellants upon the ground that the notice of appeal - was filed too late. This question turns upon whether or not there was a motion pending for a new trial. Appellants claim that the notice of intention to move for a new trial was not properly served and filed. Since the hearing of the motion affidavits have been filed showing that the notice of intention to move for a new trial was properly served by mail. The notice *337 of appeal from the judgment was filed within due time after the disposition of the motion for a new trial and the motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment is, therefore, denied.