Voorhees

Voorhees v. Gunsul

Good Law
1 Cal. 2d 199·1934 Cal. LEXIS 348·34 P.2d 161
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 29, 1934S. F. No. 15113California667 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This is a companion case to action S. F. No. 15114, entitled Marie Voorhees v. H. C. Morse, as City Treasurer of the City of Long Beach, this day filed (ante, p. 179 [ 34 Pac. (2d) 153 ]). By her petition, the petitioner herein asks for a writ of mandamus directed to the respondent as city auditor of said city commanding her to notify the city treasurer of said city of the fact that there were on the nineteenth day of February, 1934, and at the commencement of this proceeding, sufficient moneys in the city fund in the city treasury to pay all of the warrants outstanding against said fund on said nineteenth day of February, 1934, including warrant No. D-71, and to notify said city treasurer of the numbers of the warrants which could be redeemed by the application of said moneys in said city fund.

Petitioner at all times mentioned herein was. the owner of said warrant No. D-71. Said warrant was issued on the seventeenth day of February, 1934, in payment of a valid claim against said city pursuant to Ordinance No. C-1251 of said city, which ordinance and certain provisions thereof are referred to in detail in the opinion rendered in action S. F. No. 15114, above mentioned. At the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.