Busing

Busing v. Pierson

Good Law
1 Cal. 2d 495·1934 Cal. LEXIS 403·36 P.2d 116
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 1934L. A. No. 14507California525 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal herein or to affirm the judgment appealed from, urging that nothing of merit has been advanced in support of a reversal.

The action was brought for the purpose of foreclosing two mortgages given to secure an indebtedness of $1600, evidenced by two promissory notes, each in the sum of $800. The property mortgaged consists of several parcels of real property. When recorded, the mortgages became first liens on the property. Plaintiff is the assignee of the notes and mortgages. The defendant, by mesne conveyances, became the owner of the mortgaged property. In due time plaintiff commenced this foreclosure action which, after trial, terminated in defendant’s favor principally upon the theory that the action was barred. This court reversed the judgment. (Dexter v. Pierson, 214 Cal. 247 [ 4 Pac. (2d) 932 ].) Upon the second trial judgment went for the plaintiff, whereupon the defendant McKenna prosecuted the present appeal. She urges fifteen grounds in support of a reversal. Comparison of these contentions with those urged by appellant in her brief upon the prior appeal in an effort to sustain a judgment favorable to her and to demonstrate the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.