Rainey

Rainey v. Sulentor

Good Law
1 Cal. 2d 675·1934 Cal. LEXIS 431·37 P.2d 80
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 22, 1934L. A. No. 14808California1,457 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shenk, J.

Acting under the authority of section 135c, added to the Bank Act in 1933 (Stats. 1933, p. 318), the Superintendent of Banks appointed Henry E. Sherer as Conservator of the Bank of San Pedro. Subsequently the conservator sold certain assets of the Bank of San Pedro to Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association for the sum of $1,047,330.60. Thereafter the Superintendent of Banks and the conservator filed in the superior court their return and petition for confirmation of the sale. Objections to the confirmation were filed by the appellants, a copartnership doing business as Standard Fisheries Company, and Louise A. Steele, for and on behalf of themselves and all other depositors and creditors of the San Pedro Bank. The Van Camp Sea Food Company, Inc., a large depositor, filed a document called “intervention”, praying that the sale be confirmed. The matter came on regularly before the court and after a full hearing the court found and concluded that the sale had been fairly made and legally conducted; that the price was not disproportionate to the value of the property sold; that a better price or better terms for all of said assets could not be obtained; and that it would…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.