Sisk

Sisk v. California Natiional Bank

Good Law
1 Cal. 2d 681·1934 Cal. LEXIS 432·36 P.2d 1073
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 22, 1934L. A. No. 14360California2,076 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shenk, J.

Appeal from a judgment for the defendant Barnes. The action was brought to recover the sum of $7,906.02 on deposit with the defendant bank, and levied upon under execution to satisfy partially a judgment of the plaintiff Spencer against the defendant Barnes.

Prior to 1909 Spencer and Barnes were copartners in the sale of certain mining properties. Barnes sold the properties and collected the proceeds. Spencer engaged Messrs. Andrew M. Strong and Lewis B. Works as his attorneys to prosecute his claim against Barnes for an accounting and a share of the proceeds of the sale, under a written agreement to pay his attorneys forty per cent of any recovery. In an action commenced in 1909 in the Superior Court in Los Angeles County, in which an amended complaint was filed by said attorneys in 1912, the plaintiff recovered a judgment for $69,325 against Barnes. Suit on the judgment was brought in the state of Oregon under an agreement with Oregon attorneys, Messrs. Oscar Hayter, W. T. Slater, and P. M. Etheridge, to pay them fifty-five per cent of any amounts recovered in Oregon. There is evidence indicating that there was also an oral agreement by Spencer to pay the California attorneys…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.