Pacific Finance Corp. v. First National Bank

Good Law
1935 Cal. LEXIS 494·4 Cal. 2d 47·47 P.2d 460
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1935L. A. No. 15167California1,347 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Preston, J.

Plaintiff, as the payee of a draft or hill of exchange drawn by the defendant, presented it to the drawee for payment but was refused and, after protest, this action was begun for its face value. The amount of the draft was $9,702.28 but the parties stipulated that in the event of judgment for the plaintiff the true amount should be $4,902, with interest and costs. The court made findings in favor of plaintiff and gave judgment for the stipulated amount. Defendant has appealed upon a full record.

The facts necessary to a determination of the dispute are without conflict. They are to the effect that plaintiff held a chattel mortgage upon the dairy herd of one Houston and *48 wife. Defendant, intending to take a mortgage upon said chattels, and as the agent of the mortgagor, on October 8, 1930, wrote the plaintiff requesting that the note and mortgage and a proper release thereof be sent to it for collection. On October 9, 1930, plaintiff responded advising defendant it would not send the instruments “before they are paid in full”, further stating the amount due and the rate of interest, and then saying, “upon the payment of this amount we will immediately send you all necessary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.