Baker

Baker v. Baker

Good Law
1935 Cal. LEXIS 532·4 Cal. 2d 235·48 P.2d 685
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 23, 1935Sac. No. 4907California1,010 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Preston, J.

This is an action to establish and quiet title in plaintiff, against the claims of defendant, to an undivided one-third interest in a residence property in Red Bluff, Tehama County, California, and to have an accounting of certain rents, issues, and profits thereof. The amended complaint herein was filed May 24, 1933, and is cast in three causes of action: First, to deraign title from Sarah E. Baker, deceased, through probate proceedings in her estate and decree of distribution therein awarding said undivided one-third interest in said property to the husband and predecessor of plaintiff. The statement of this count is coupled with a long recital of facts intended to show an estoppel in pais against the claims of defendant under an unrecorded deed from said decedent. The second cause of action is the general and conventional one to quiet title. The third is for an accounting as to one-third of the rentals collected by defendant subsequent to September 29, 1932. The answer may be deemed a traverse of all the material allegations of the amended complaint and it specifically sets up the deed from the decedent, Sarah E. Baker, to defendant, under which he claims title to the whole…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.