Skelly

People v. Skelly

Good Law
1936 Cal. LEXIS 395·5 Cal. 2d 283·54 P.2d 1
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 1936Crim. No. 3865California1,663 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Curtis, J.

Appellants were found guilty after a trial by court, without a jury, of seventeen counts of grand theft, the total amount of the thefts charged aggregating about $39,000. The two appellants are brothers who, at the time of the alleged offenses, were officers of a corporation known as “Douglas L. Skelly Company, Inc.”, which company had been licensed by the corporation department of the state of California to do business as a stock broker. Douglas L. Skelly owned practically the entire stock of the company and was undoubtedly the one who had the controlling direction of the *284 company.. Robert B. Skelly, his younger brother, owned one share of stock in the company, and was a director, the treasurer, and trading manager of -the company. This appeal is from the order denying the motion for a new trial and from the judgment of conviction.

The conviction of the appellants is predicated primarily, and almost solely, upon the testimony of the complaining witness, Charles T. Davis. This testimony is to the effect that on March 14, 1932, he deposited with the Douglas L. Skelly Company, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the “Skelly Company”, securities consisting of stocks and bonds of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.