Hewitt

Hewitt v. San Jose Pacific Co.

Good Law
1936 Cal. LEXIS 516·6 Cal. 2d 372·57 P.2d 907
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 14, 1936S. F. No. 15634California355 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Respondents move to dismiss the appeal from the judgment in the above-entitled action on the ground that the printed transcript was not filed within the prescribed time. The affidavit on behalf of the moving parties and the certificate of the county clerk of Alameda County which accompanied the motion show that a bill of exceptions was prepared and settled, and the time for printing and filing of the transcript of the record on appeal in this court ex-pired six months ago.

Appellant seeks to avoid a dismissal of the appeal on the ground that the bill of exceptions was improperly settled and allowed, and that thereafter appellant sought an order qf the trial court to resettle, revise and amend the bill; that said application was denied. Appellant further contends *373 that from this judgment of denial an appeal is now pending in this court. Investigation of the records of this court fail to show such appeal; but, on petition for rehearing, the plaintiff has filed herein a certified copy of “Notice of Appeal from Special Order Made after Pinal Judgment”, on file in the office of the clerk of the Superior Court in and for the County of Alameda. Notwithstanding the filing of such…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.