Papineau

Papineau v. Security-First National Bank

Good Law
1936 Cal. LEXIS 570·6 Cal. 2d 668·59 P.2d 131
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 30, 1936L. A. No. 14288California605 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Langdon, J.

This action was brought for declaratory relief and damages for alleged fraud.

In 1916 Mrs. Louise Ganahl and nine others, including defendants' Vincent P. Ganahl and Ernest Ganahl, executed a declaration of trust under which property was transferred in trust to German-American Trust and Savings Bank, predecessor of defendant Security-First National Bank, as trustee. Ernest Ganahl was made agent of the trustee for rent collection and similar duties. The various transferors had one-tenth beneficial interests in the trust.

On July 23, 1925, defendant Vincent P. Ganahl borrowed $5,000 from defendant bank, giving his promissory note secured by an assignment of his one-tenth beneficial interest in the trust. Later Vincent P. Ganahl contracted with plaintiff to purchase property for the sum of $40,000, and on July 18, 1929, as security for his obligation to pay the price, he made another assignment of his one-tenth interest in the trust. He failed to pay the bank the money borrowed, and on January 17, 1931, the bank sold his interest at a public sale. Defendant Ernest Ganahl purchased the same at the sale for the sum of $5,392.83. .

Plaintiff brought this action on the theory that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.