Mayo

Mayo v. Mayo

Good Law
1936 Cal. LEXIS 712·8 Cal. 2d 9·63 P.2d 822
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 11, 1936L. A. No. 13321California321 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This is an appeal from an order appointing a receiver pendente lite, and, so far as we are *10 presently informed, is the last of several appeals arising out of the marital difficulties of the Mayo family.

Pending the trial of a divorce action commenced by her husband, the defendant Marguerite Mayo moved the trial court for the appointment of a receiver pendente lite. The affidavit filed in support of the motion averred, among other things, that the plaintiff had transferred certain income-bearing real property to the appellants Smith for the purpose of concealing the same from her and with the alleged understanding that the Smiths would hold the title for plaintiff’s benefit. Opposition was offered by the Smiths to the appointment of a receiver. However, the court below granted the motion and designated a receiver to handle the property. The Smiths thereupon prosecuted this appeal from the order.

Pending the disposition of the present appeal there has been brought to this court for review the decree thereafter entered in the divorce action (L. A. No. 14019) and the decrees entered in two other actions (L. A. No. 13834 and L. A. No. 14257) wherein the appellants Smith sought to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.