Kentfield

Kentfield v. Kentfield

Good Law
1936 Cal. LEXIS 728·8 Cal. 2d 75·63 P.2d 1111
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 31, 1936S. F. No. 15509California2,092 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Seawell, J.

The action which gives rise to this appeal was brought by the trustees of a trust agreement in which Edward E. Kentfield was trustor, praying for the settlement of certain accounts, fixing the compensation of said trustees and for instructions as to whether or not an accumulating fund created for the purpose of securing the payment of a *77 certain indebtedness owing by Edward E. Kentfield to his son John Kentfield, since deceased, as evidenced by six promissory notes executed by the father to the son, should be distributed to the father, the sole heir of said son, or whether, as contended by appellants, it should be held by the trustees for the future support and maintenance of said Edward E. Kentfield during the remainder of his life, and upon his death the unexpended remainder should go to the four children of said Edward E. Kentfield, as provided in said trust agreement. The notes were distributed to the father by the probate court, and the trial court herein held that said promissory notes were not extinguished by merger or otherwise and gave judgment that the trustees pay and deliver all of the balance of the funds remaining in their hands, to wit, the sum of $10,221.26, to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.