Lee Wong v. Lee Gang

Good Law
1937 Cal. LEXIS 321·8 Cal. 2d 614·67 P.2d 333
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 22, 1937S. F. No. 15589California895 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Langdon, J.

This is an action for a partnership accounting. Plaintiff Lee Wong and defendant Lee Gang commenced a jobbing carpenter business as partners in 1914. Defendant generally paid the bills and kept the books. In 1932 the partners employed Lee Kai Mon to work on the books, and he made a number of entries of items of expense, many of which had been incurred years before. The partners quarreled about these and other matters, and in August, 1933, the partnership was dissolved by mutual consent. There remained, however, the question of accounting and division of assets. Counting the late entries of bills made by Lee Kai Mon, it appeared that plaintiff had overdrawn his share of the partnership income, and owed defendant a. considerable sum of money. Plaintiff, however, challenged the validity of the late entries of defendant’s disbursements, claiming that they were unsubstantiated by evidence, and that the long delay tended to indicate their falsity. Both parties were members of the Lee Family Association of America, and in February, 1934, both voluntarily agreed to submit all the books and accounts to the said association for settlement of the controversy. They further agreed that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.