McNeill

People v. McNeill

Good Law
1937 Cal. LEXIS 326·8 Cal. 2d 644·67 P.2d 346
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 27, 1937Crim. No. 4082California1,362 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Seawell, J.

In an indictment returned by the grand jury of Riverside County, the defendant was charged with the murder of his wife, committed on August 13, 1936. At the conclusion of the trial, the jury brought in a verdict of murder of the first degree without recommendation, and sentence imposing the extreme penalty was pronounced. *645 While ably and vigorously represented by counsel upon the trial, no appeal has been noticed by the defendant. The cause comes before us under the provisions of the commonly designated “automatic appeal” statute. (Pen. Code, sec. 1239.)

It appears that at the time of the homicide the defendant and deceased had been married approximately twenty-five years. There were four children of the union aged, respectively, 13, 15, 17 and 19 years. Deceased was 49 years of age and defendant was 52. On the day upon which deceased met her death the parties were living in the town of Temecula, where the defendant was engaged as a blacksmith and deputy constable. The evidence is undisputed that some time between 12 and 1 o’clock on the afternoon of August 13, 1936, the deceased was the victim of a brutal beating about the head and body that caused her demise several hours…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.