Bryant

H. & J. Mabury Co. v. Bryant

Good Law
1937 Cal. LEXIS 430·9 Cal. 2d 586·71 P.2d 1111
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 1937L. A. No. 16173California1,731 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

In October, 1931, plaintiff Mabury Company brought this action to quiet title to some 1260 acres of *587 land located in Kern County. In December, 1931, the defendant, administrator of the estates of Berryman Bryant and Henrietta F. Bryant, both deceased, answered and also cross-complained, asserting an interest in and seeking to quiet title to about 17,920 acres of land, called the Antelope ranch, which included within its borders the 1260 acres described in plaintiff’s complaint. In April, 1936, the original defendant administrator having died, there was a substitution of a new defendant administrator. In May, 1936, plaintiff filed an answer to defendant’s cross-complaint, claiming title to all the land described therein save about 320 acres, and praying that its title thereto be quieted.

After further proceedings in the cause, wherein a demurrer to the answer to the cross-complaint was overruled, and the trial date was set, defendant, on September 11, 1936, moved for a continuance on the ground that there were two other causes of action pending between the same parties as to the same subject-matter, and also moved that he be allowed to amend his answer and cross-complaint to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.