City of Los Angeles v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
1937 Cal. LEXIS 438·9 Cal. 2d 624·72 P.2d 138·113 A.L.R. 370
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 1937L. A. No. 14897California2,396 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shenk, J.

The City of Los Angeles sued the County of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles Railway Corporation in eleven actions to recover amounts aggregating $99,820.49. That sum represents percentages paid by the railway corporation to the county from the years 1911 to 1930 pursuant to eleven franchises granted by the county to the railway corporation but which, by reason of the annexation to the *626 city of the territory over which the railway corporation operated should have been paid to the city. (San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Rys. v. County of Alameda, 66 Cal. App. 77 [ 225 Pac. 304 ].) Among other defenses, both defendants interposed the plea of the statute of limitations. The actions were consolidated for trial. The court dismissed the action as to the railway corporation and rendered judgment for the plaintiff against the county for the full amount of its claim. The county appealed from the whole of the judgment, and the city appealed from that portion of the judgment which dismissed the action as against the railway corporation.

Ten franchises were granted to the railway corporation between February 1, 1906, and October 22, 1909, and the eleventh in March, 1923. All were issued…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.