Harper

Richardson v. Harper

Good Law
11 Cal. 2d 313·1938 Cal. LEXIS 304·79 P.2d 1057
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 25, 1938L. A. No. 15775California854 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

For the reason that with respect to the issue herein involved, in similar situations, a diversity of opinion appeared as between or among several respective jurisdictions, a hearing of the appeal in the instant case was ordered to be had in this court, after decision of the original appeal by the District Court of Appeal. After careful consideration of the facts of the case and the law applicable thereto, this court is satisfied with, and hereby adopts as its own, the opinion and decision that was prepared by Mr. Justice Sturtevant of the Second Division of the District Court of Appeal, First District. It is as follows:

“ In presenting his appeal the superintendent of banks says: ‘There is but a single question involved: whether or not á depositor in the savings department of a state bank in liquidation may set off his deposit against a loan in the commercial department of said bank.’ The petitioner says: ‘It is better stated thus: Does the Bank Act specifically forbid the interdepartmental offset of a savings deposit against a debt owed by the savings depositor to the commercial department in determining the assets and investments of an insolvent bank ? ’

“The present Bank Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.