Speik
Speik v. Sutphin
15 Cal. 2d 764·1940 Cal. LEXIS 270·99 P.2d 656
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 29, 1940L. A. No. 16530California94 words
Lead Opinion
Gibson, J.
This is an action to quiet title and to obtain declaratory relief in respect to rights arising under an *765 oil lease. The action raises the same issues as those presented in the companion case of Sutphin v. Speik, L. A. No. 17142 (ante, p. 195 [ 99 Pac. (2d) 652 ]), this day decided. On the authority of that ease the judgment is affirmed.
Edmonds, J., Carter, J., Curtis, J., Waste, C. J., Wood, J., pro tem., and McComb, J., pro tem., concurred.
Rehearing denied. Shenk, J., and Houser, J., did not participate.