Badal

Badal v. Adams

Good Law
16 Cal. 2d 127·1940 Cal. LEXIS 286·104 P.2d 1023
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 23, 1940Sac. No. 5281California900 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plaintiff, a judgment creditor of defendants Isaac and Sarah Adams, brought this action to subject *128 to the lien of his judgment certain real property owned by said defendants, the record title to which had been transferred to their son, defendant Albert Adams, by means of an alleged fraudulent foreclosure and sale. Trial of the cause resulted in a decree in favor of plaintiff from which defendants have appealed. Their principal contention is that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment. We are of the opinion that the evidence is sufficient.

On July 11, 1931, plaintiff secured a judgment against Isaac and Sarah Adams for $1,091.85. He renewed this judgment in November, 1936, for the sum of $1508.64, and at about the same time he became the assignee of a $214 judgment against them. Abstracts of these judgments were recorded, and the judgments thus became liens upon real property owned by the judgment debtors in Stanislaus County.

The only real property standing of record in the names of Isaac and Sarah Adams in 1931 was their ranch home, upon which they had resided for many years. They had previously executed a deed of trust on this property to the People’s State…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.