Asbury Rapid Transit System v. Railroad Commission

Good Law
18 Cal. 2d 105·1941 Cal. LEXIS 338·114 P.2d 573
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 18, 1941S. F. No. 16506; S. F. No. 16507California1,690 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shenk, J.

Absburry Rapid Transit System, a corporation, and City of Los Angeles filed separate petitions to review and annul an order of the Railroad Commission requiring the petitioner, Asbury Rapid Transit System, to cease and desist from certain operations as a common carrier of passengers by motor transportation until it should have obtained a certificate of public convenience and necessity. The issues presented by both petitions and the return to the writ of review issued herein were consolidated for argument and decision.

It appears that in December, 1939, Asbury Rapid Transit System operated several lines of motor vehicle passenger service between Los Angeles and other cities and adjoining unincorporated territory in Los Angeles County as a certificated carrier under the supervision and regulation of the Railroad Commission, pursuant to the Public Utilities Act. During that month and without obtaining a certificate of public convenience and necessity, it inaugurated and began the operation of an additional motor vehicle common carrier passenger service between the downtown and the Highland Park and Garvanza sections of the city of Los Angeles, terminating at a point two blocks…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.