Rolkin

Miller v. Rolkin

Good Law
1942 Cal. LEXIS 252·20 Cal. 2d 124·124 P.2d 12
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 2, 1942S. F. No. 16301California1,553 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Traynor, J.

Mrs. Katie Bichards Wear owned certain real property in Sonoma County encumbered by deeds of trust securing promissory notes for $27,800 and by a mortgage securing a note for $3,525. In 1920 she entered into a written contract with Edward Bolldn providing that he would advance the money to purchase these notes and the instruments securing them; that she would sell her property in Sonoma County and apply the money received from the sales in payment of the notes to him; that upon payment of the notes he would receive 25% of all additional proceeds from the sale of the lands, and that she would convey a one-fourth undivided interest to him in any lands that might remain unsold after six years. Pursuant to the agreement, Bolkin purchased the notes and the instruments securing them. In 1922, Mrs. Wear sold certain property in Sonoma County to Thomas H. Corcoran and his wife for $49,000. The purchasers paid $9,000 down and gave a note of $40,000 for the balance, secured by a mortgage and deed of trust. The note, mortgage, and deed *126 of trust were made out and delivered to Rolkin. He in turn executed and delivered to Mrs. Wear a declaration of trust, subsequently recorded, that he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.