Karp

Karp v. Hopalong Cassidy, Inc.

Good Law
1956 Cal. LEXIS 209·46 Cal. 2d 534·297 P.2d 425
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 25, 1956L. A. No. 23078; L. A. No. 23115California1,744 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Shenk, J.

These are consolidated appeals from orders of the superior court sitting in the probate of the estate of Harry A. Sherman. The contestant Hopalong Cassidy, Inc., in action Number 23078 appeals from an order of August 10, 1953, vacating an order of June 22, 1953, confirming the sale *536 of personal property from the estate to Hopalong individually. The contestants in action Number 23115, who claim to be heirs at law and creditors of the decedent, appeal from an order of August 24 confirming for the second time the sale of the property to Hopalong.

Harry A. Sherman died testate on September 25, 1952. Jacob H. Karp was appointed and qualified as executor of his will. The testator provided in his will that the executor might “do any and all things necessary in the management and distribution of my estate as he, in his discretion, shall deem advisable. ’ ’ The estate consisted in part of 200,000 feet of film footage. The executor negotiated for and made a private agreement for the sale of the film to Hopalong for $5,000. He petitioned for and obtained the order of June 22d confirming the sale but he failed to serve notice of the hearing on the heirs and creditors appearing herein.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.