Theisen

Theisen v. County of Los Angeles

Bad Law
1960 Cal. LEXIS 157·5 Cal. Rptr. 161·54 Cal. 2d 170·352 P.2d 529
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 20, 1960L. A. No. 25221California5,834 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Schauer, J.

Plaintiffs-cross-defendants appeal from a judgment which is adverse to them in their action for declaratory relief and which awards defendant-cross-complainant, the county of Los Angeles, $648 in its cross-action on the obligation of a release bond. Plaintiffs-cross-defendants are the copartners in a firm (hereinafter sometimes called Theisen) which was the general contractor on a county construction job and Theisen’s surety on such bond. In reliance on the bond the county released to Theisen $648 which it had withheld pursuant to a stop notice. Defendants are the county, its auditor, and Durand, a materialman who filed the stop notice and thereafter recovered $648 from the county in a municipal court action (to which plaintiffs were not parties) on the claim which was the basis of his stop notice. Plaintiffs brought the present action for a declaration of the rights and obligations of the parties under the bond and the municipal court judgment and the county brought the cross-action on the obligation of the bond.

On evidence which is without material conflict the superior court found the facts, made conclusions of law which reject plaintiffs’ legal position in this controversy,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.