Crawford

Crawford v. State Bar of California

Good Law
1960 Cal. LEXIS 197·54 Cal. 2d 659·7 Cal. Rptr. 746·355 P.2d 490
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 1960S. F. No. 20290California3,021 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Petitioner seeks the annulment of a resolution adopted by eight of the thirteen members of the Board of Governors of The State Bar present and voting that he be publicly reproved for violation of rule 3, Rules of Professional Ethics ( 52 Cal.2d 896 ). The local committee had recommended that no disciplinary action be taken.

Petitioner, now 35 years old, was admitted to the bar in 1953, after which he practiced in Sacramento for approximately 14 months. His father, Howard G. Crawford, was admitted in 1923 and practiced in Lakeport continually thereafter. In May 1954, after the Board of Governors had recommended Howard’s disbarment, petitioner and his father formed a partnership, the profits from which were to be divided equally. Formal announcements of the partnership were sent out at that time. Howard was disbarred on September 16, 1954. After his disbarment he remained in the same office, kept his secretary, and continued his practice as a tax consultant. His name was no longer used as an attorney, and he did not appear in court, but he did confer directly with clients with respect to the preparation of deeds and birth certificates, probate matters, escrows and real estate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.