Arstein

Arstein v. Union Bank

Good Law
14 Cal. Rptr. 809·1961 Cal. LEXIS 288·56 Cal. 2d 239·364 P.2d 33
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 20, 1961L. A. No. 25956California1,262 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

McComb, J.

This is an appeal from a portion of a judgment determining that the entire estate of appellant’s husband, who died July 10, 1958, was his sole and separate property.

Facts: Meyer A. Arstein and appellant were married in Illinois in 1951. They moved to California the same year and resided here continuously until he died July 10, 1958.

Decedent’s will left a bequest to appellant. She filed a petition for a determination of the nature and extent of the property in the estate, so that she could make an intelligent election whether to take under the will or to take her community property interest by law.

The trial court made the following findings: (1) decedent’s net worth at the time of marriage was at least $438,918.93; (2) aggregate income during the marriage was $256,277.23; (3) separate income of decedent was at least $184,345.98; (4) community income during the marriage was a maximum of $71,931.25; (5) community living expenses during the marriage were at least $108,868.40.

Predicated upon the foregoing findings, the trial court found that the entire estate of decedent consisted of his separate property, since living expenses during the marriage exceeded community…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.