Stigall

Stigall v. City of Taft

Good Law
1962 Cal. LEXIS 288·25 Cal. Rptr. 441·58 Cal. 2d 565·375 P.2d 289
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 23, 1962S. F. No. 20906California2,128 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

White, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of dismissal entered upon demurrers to the complaint which were sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiff seeks a declaration of the invalidity of a certain contract for plumbing work to be performed by the defendant Taft Plumbing Company, Inc., for the defendant City of Taft.

Plaintiff, a taxpayer of the City of Taft, alleges in his complaint that Glenn D, Black was a member of the city *567 council and was in charge of the council’s building committee of the City of Taft for several years prior to June 8, 1961; that the committee supervised the drawing of plans and specifications and the call for bids for the construction of a civic center; that during a portion of the times involved Councilman Black was also the owner of a plumbing business known as the Taft Plumbing Company and later the owner of more than 3 per cent of the shares of stock of the Taft Plumbing Company, Inc., after its incorporation; that in January 1961 bids were received and opened at a regular meeting of the city council; that the Taft Plumbing Company, Inc., was the low bidder for plumbing work; that several persons objected to the bids by the plumbing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.