Hamer

Hamer v. Town of Ross

Good Law
1963 Cal. LEXIS 209·31 Cal. Rptr. 335·59 Cal. 2d 776·382 P.2d 375
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 13, 1963S. F. No. 20667California5,849 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Tobriner, J.

While zoning ordinances which impose a one-acre lot restriction cannot properly apply to property which is virtually surrounded by parcels of lesser size, they may, conversely, restrict the use of the property to a single-family dwelling because that usage is the predominant characteristic of the property in the general area. Applying the accepted test that we will uphold such a regulation if its reasonableness is fairly debatable, we sustain the single-family restriction. We further hold that the ordinances may severably be enforced as to the single-family restriction although not as to the one-acre requirement. We proceed to set forth our reasons for these conclusions.

The case involves an appeal by the Town of Ross from a judgment declaring void the application of its zoning ordinances in imposing upon plaintiff's property a restriction to a single-family dwelling upon a one-acre lot and in ordering the issuance of a building permit for the construction of multiple dwelling garden apartments on the property.

The essential physical facts are undisputed. Plaintiff owns an irregularly shaped 2.2-acre parcel of land in Ross which she purchased in 1938. The eastern boundary of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.