Mesna

Mesna v. Dawson

Good Law
1964 Cal. LEXIS 179·37 Cal. Rptr. 193·61 Cal. 2d 91·389 P.2d 721
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 5, 1964L. A. No. 27598California394 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Gibson, J.

Richard Mesna, H. Ross Njaa, and Randall Davidson, who were probationary teachers for the Vista-Unified School District of San Diego County, were notified on May 9, 1962, that the school board had determined that *92 their services would not he required for the ensuing school year. Hearings were requested, which were set for July 10, 1962. Prior to the hearings petitioners sought a writ of mandate in the superior court directing the board to rehire them for the school year 1962-1963. Petitioners Mesna and Njaa have appealed from the judgment denying the writ.

The principal questions presented on this appeal are decided in Sitzman v. City Board of Education of the City of Eureka, ante, p. 88 [ 37 Cal.Rptr. 191 , 389 P.2d 719 ], and Horner v. Board of Trustees of Excelsior Union High School Dist., ante, p. 79 [ 37 Cal.Rptr. 185 , 389 P.2d 713 ]. In Sitzman we held that section 13444 of the Education Code as amended in 1961 is applicable to probationary teachers who were hired before the effective date of the amendment but were not dismissed until after that date. In Horner we held that under section 13444 as amended in 1961 probationary teachers who are not reemployed at the end of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.