Moore

Moore v. State Bar

Good Law
1964 Cal. LEXIS 158·41 Cal. Rptr. 161·62 Cal. 2d 74·396 P.2d 577
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 18, 1964L. A. No. 27885California2,828 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Petitioner, David C. Moore, was admitted to practice law in this state in 1941. He has no previous disciplinary record. The Board of Governors by a vote of 14 to 1 recommends that he be suspended from practice for a period of 90 days for misconduct in connection with his representation of one Butler. Although it appears that petitioner's difficulties arose to some extent out of his misplaced reliance upon a fellow lawyer, the record further establishes that petitioner personally breached his professional obligations of service and protection to a client, and that the recommended discipline is warranted.

On November 25, 1961, at a consultation in a public bar, petitioner accepted employment from Butler to represent him in a lawsuit pending in the Los Angeles Municipal Court, in which a judgment of $700 plus interest was sought against Butler. Petitioner stated to Butler that in addition to an answer to the complaint he would perhaps file a cross-complaint on Butler's behalf; petitioner was to share on a contingent fee basis in any recovery on a cross-complaint. Attorney Barnes was also present in the bar, and according to petitioner he introduced Barnes to Butler as “my employee,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.